🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and fit for young users," said a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is mostly occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills mandating adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.