🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to reopen talks with the US government. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Tehran representatives stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He said the strikes began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the identical language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the face of this assault."